1996:
M Konishi et al.
Gastroenterology 111 (2), 307-17 (Aug 1996)
info:pmid/8690195
BACKGROUND mp; AIMS: Microsatellite instability (replication error [RER]) is a characteristic of tumors in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC), but the mechanism of HNPCC carcinogenesis is not yet understood. To clarify the nature of HNPCC tumors, RER and genetic changes were compared between HNPCC and non-HNPCC tumors. METHODS: RER and genetic changes were analyzed in 21 HNPCC, 389 familial adenomatous polyposis, and 206 sporadic tumors using polymerase chain reaction, single-strand conformation polymorphism, sequencing, and Southern hybridization. RESULTS. in HNPCC, 95% tumors at all stages showed RER positivity (altered loci, 4.3 of 5). In familial adenomatous polyposis and sporadic tumors, RER positivity (1.7 of 5) was 3% in adenoma and intramucosal carcinoma, 13%-24% in invasive carcinoma, and 35% in carcinoma metastasized to liver. Fifty percent of RER-positive HNPCC tumors had both germline and somatic mutations of hMSH2 or hMLH1 gene, whereas 6% of RER-positive non-HNPCC had somatic mutation. APC, p53, and K-ras-2 mutations and loss of heterozygosity of tumor-suppressor genes were significantly less frequent (P = 0.03 to 0.0006) but transforming growth factor beta type II receptor mutation was significantly more frequent (P = 0.000001) in HNPCC than in non-HNPCC. CONCLUSIONS: RER positivity occurs from an early stage of carcinogenesis in HNPCC but in later stages in non-HNPCC. Most HNPCC tumors may develop through different genetic changes from those in the adenoma-carcinoma sequence, although a certain percentage develops through APC mutation.
M Konishi et al.
Gastroenterology 111 (2), 307-17 (Aug 1996)
info:pmid/8690195
BACKGROUND mp; AIMS: Microsatellite instability (replication error [RER]) is a characteristic of tumors in hereditary nonpolyposis colon cancer (HNPCC), but the mechanism of HNPCC carcinogenesis is not yet understood. To clarify the nature of HNPCC tumors, RER and genetic changes were compared between HNPCC and non-HNPCC tumors. METHODS: RER and genetic changes were analyzed in 21 HNPCC, 389 familial adenomatous polyposis, and 206 sporadic tumors using polymerase chain reaction, single-strand conformation polymorphism, sequencing, and Southern hybridization. RESULTS. in HNPCC, 95% tumors at all stages showed RER positivity (altered loci, 4.3 of 5). In familial adenomatous polyposis and sporadic tumors, RER positivity (1.7 of 5) was 3% in adenoma and intramucosal carcinoma, 13%-24% in invasive carcinoma, and 35% in carcinoma metastasized to liver. Fifty percent of RER-positive HNPCC tumors had both germline and somatic mutations of hMSH2 or hMLH1 gene, whereas 6% of RER-positive non-HNPCC had somatic mutation. APC, p53, and K-ras-2 mutations and loss of heterozygosity of tumor-suppressor genes were significantly less frequent (P = 0.03 to 0.0006) but transforming growth factor beta type II receptor mutation was significantly more frequent (P = 0.000001) in HNPCC than in non-HNPCC. CONCLUSIONS: RER positivity occurs from an early stage of carcinogenesis in HNPCC but in later stages in non-HNPCC. Most HNPCC tumors may develop through different genetic changes from those in the adenoma-carcinoma sequence, although a certain percentage develops through APC mutation.
Comments